Pulse issueshttps://support.cubewise.com/code/pulse/-/issues2022-04-05T23:08:45Zhttps://support.cubewise.com/code/pulse/-/issues/3336Package Migration - Detailed Dimension Change - Check/Uncheck Confirm for Lon...2022-04-05T23:08:45ZFelipe Fonsecaffonseca@cubewise.comPackage Migration - Detailed Dimension Change - Check/Uncheck Confirm for Long Changes
> Mark the issue as **Confidential** to keep log files and screenshots private
**1. Product versions:**
- OS and Version: Microsoft Windows Server 2019 Datacenter Server 10.0.17763 Build 17763 (x86_64)
- TM1/PA Version: 11.8.00800....
> Mark the issue as **Confidential** to keep log files and screenshots private
**1. Product versions:**
- OS and Version: Microsoft Windows Server 2019 Datacenter Server 10.0.17763 Build 17763 (x86_64)
- TM1/PA Version: 11.8.00800.5
- Pulse Version: 6.0.5
- Browser: Chrome
**3. Describe the bug**
When I'm migrating a package, in the **Review Changes** page, I select a dimension.
In the bottom table **Detailed Changes**, there is this column **Confirm**, where I can check
![check](/uploads/d84d80d164999929f255b1a1225ce17c/image.png) / uncheck ![image](/uploads/262c997377873b83eb73ccf53fba9047/image.png) each dimension's change.
For some other dimensions in my package, I can’t confirm each change because it’s just an icon ![image](/uploads/7d4b976be6818196f9c68d4631143ff6/image.png) ![image](/uploads/70e689e24479ad2802932e433078686d/image.png) , i.e., the option seems to be disabled, as you can see in the screenshot.
**4. To Reproduce**
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
1. Go to **Migration** > **View Package** > Select a package
2. Click on **Execute** > Select a server > Select an instance > Select options
3. Click **Next**
4. Select a Dimension in the **Proposed Changes** table and click on **Review Changes** ![image](/uploads/0e4fa1c6010f88d1ac64f594cc04bdec/image.png)
5. **Detailed Changes** expand on the bottom and shows static check marks in the **Confirm** column, instead of showing a Check/Uncheck control object
**5. Expected behavior**
I'd like to be able to check/uncheck each individual dimension's change even though the number of changes in the dimension is high.
**6. Screenshots**
![image](/uploads/be8dc165d1d2d11812b8ec80497df4dd/image.png)https://support.cubewise.com/code/pulse/-/issues/3333Improve dimension detail changes selection when deploying a migration package2022-04-06T00:15:13ZswImprove dimension detail changes selection when deploying a migration packagefor dimension detail changes the current true/false selection ***per change*** is a long way from optimal. I can think of several ways to improve it that I as a user would have found very helpful when doing migrations.
1. a "unselect ...for dimension detail changes the current true/false selection ***per change*** is a long way from optimal. I can think of several ways to improve it that I as a user would have found very helpful when doing migrations.
1. a "unselect all changes" button (this is different from the option to apply detail changes. That selects all changes by default and then if you only want to deploy a limited set you as the user is forced to unselect each and every check box you don't want. It would be far better to be able to unselect all and then just select the changes you want)
2. an option to skip element delections
3. have 3 options, one to "apply only structure changes" a 2nd to "only create attributes", a 3rd to "apply only attribute value changes"
4. an ability to select only specific attribute values for migration (*how* this is implamented doesn't matter, just a way to filter changes and select/unselect the filtered selection would be sufficient)https://support.cubewise.com/code/pulse/-/issues/3331Migration Package - Date Format and User Name Alias2022-04-04T01:18:38ZFelipe Fonsecaffonseca@cubewise.comMigration Package - Date Format and User Name Alias
> Mark the issue as **Confidential** to keep log files and screenshots private
**1. Product versions:**
- OS and Version: Microsoft Windows Server 2019 Datacenter Server 10.0.17763 Build 17763 (x86_64)
- TM1/PA Version: 11.8.00800....
> Mark the issue as **Confidential** to keep log files and screenshots private
**1. Product versions:**
- OS and Version: Microsoft Windows Server 2019 Datacenter Server 10.0.17763 Build 17763 (x86_64)
- TM1/PA Version: 11.8.00800.5
- Pulse Version: 6.0.5
- Browser: Chrome
**3. Describe the bug**
In the package information page, the Authors is showing my AD hash.
All the dates are in US format, although my Windows regional settings is set to English UK (dd/MM/yyyy), as well as my browser settings.
The instance name is listed as a file.
**4. To Reproduce**
See screenshot.
**5. Expected behavior**
See my username alias (readable) in the field Authors.
See the date format follows my browser's locale, which is English UK in this case, dd/MM/yyyy.
Don't see the instance name listed as a file in the package.
**6. Screenshots**
![image](/uploads/12baefeb50bef6c8a3491f0b8fc92bfe/image.png)https://support.cubewise.com/code/pulse/-/issues/3330Package Migration - Review Changes - Detailed Changed - Dimension2022-04-06T00:15:27ZFelipe Fonsecaffonseca@cubewise.comPackage Migration - Review Changes - Detailed Changed - Dimension**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
I'm always frustrated when I'm migrating a package and there's a dimension being migrated. In the detailed changes, I need to manually uncheck many rows that I don't nee...**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
I'm always frustrated when I'm migrating a package and there's a dimension being migrated. In the detailed changes, I need to manually uncheck many rows that I don't need in a dimension with hundreds of elements.
**Describe the solution you'd like**
I'd like to be able to uncheck all detailed changes, sort and filter by arguments, so I can be more efficient and quick when selecting the dimension changes I wish to migrate.
**Additional context**
Usually this applies to measure dimensions, and when working together with other developers in the same model/dimension.
![image](/uploads/c6146373e8354290a5ae7dee5bc1c404/image.png)
This enhancement is related to #3333https://support.cubewise.com/code/pulse/-/issues/3327After a migration, the Author of the changes should be MIGRATION.2023-11-17T14:22:34ZVincentAfter a migration, the Author of the changes should be MIGRATION.Hi,
I noticed that in v6.1, after a Live migration the Author of the changes is the TM1 user defined in the Pulse instance settings whereas in Pulse 5, the Author was MIGRATION.
In the screenshot below, you can see on the left Pulse 6....Hi,
I noticed that in v6.1, after a Live migration the Author of the changes is the TM1 user defined in the Pulse instance settings whereas in Pulse 5, the Author was MIGRATION.
In the screenshot below, you can see on the left Pulse 6.1 and on the right Pulse 5.8.3, CXMD the instance where I made a change and then I did a Live migration into PROD:
![image](/uploads/cc05e60c8c31d7d3f9d9ec1874df80d3/image.png)
In Pulse 6, it looks like the Author Admin made the change manually whereas it was a migration.
## Expected behavior
Pulse should flagged the changes made during a Live Migration to MIGRATION.https://support.cubewise.com/code/pulse/-/issues/3266Additional filter | Pulse package filter by Instance2022-03-06T22:30:55Zshallabh.kheraAdditional filter | Pulse package filter by Instance**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
Yes - we have around 5 VMs and 15 instances & now trying to come up with master slave architecture for Pulse in v6 by consolidating Pulse for all instances. There is no w...**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
Yes - we have around 5 VMs and 15 instances & now trying to come up with master slave architecture for Pulse in v6 by consolidating Pulse for all instances. There is no way to filter packages by instance name
**Describe the solution you'd like**
With name filter - in addition (pre) - | instance column filters should be available in addition | multiple filters should be allowed
**Describe alternatives you've considered**
Add instance name in packages but that is highly manual, prone to errors, misses
**Additional context**https://support.cubewise.com/code/pulse/-/issues/3260New cube statistics dashboard in the Pulse Explorer2022-03-02T20:26:15ZVincentNew cube statistics dashboard in the Pulse ExplorerHi Team,
Would you be able to add these new Kibana objects to the next release:
[export-kibana-20220302.json](/uploads/34d1727442585b2a60e7bf532487d90a/export-kibana-20220302.json)
It includes a new dashboard to analyze the cube statis...Hi Team,
Would you be able to add these new Kibana objects to the next release:
[export-kibana-20220302.json](/uploads/34d1727442585b2a60e7bf532487d90a/export-kibana-20220302.json)
It includes a new dashboard to analyze the cube statistics:
![image](/uploads/24f7e2c0432c7280227a1bc19f34ab16/image.png)
This dashboard is based on the **pulse-tm1-object-history** index so we should not disable it by default.
Cheers,
Vincenthttps://support.cubewise.com/code/pulse/-/issues/3239Correct server status during controlled shutdown2022-02-15T22:26:48ZswCorrect server status during controlled shutdown**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
During a controlled shutdown either via Pulse or via service shutdown from services console or Cognos Configuration Pulse reports the status of the instance as "**Loadin...**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
During a controlled shutdown either via Pulse or via service shutdown from services console or Cognos Configuration Pulse reports the status of the instance as "**Loading**" during the shutdown phase, which could take quite a long time for a large instance or if save data has a lot of work to do prior to the shutdown.
It seems that Pulse automatically displays the status as "Loading" if the instance is still registered with the admin server but not responding to requests. Once the instance is no longer registered with the admin server the status changes to "Stopped".
**Describe the solution you'd like**
During a controlled shutdown the message log always contains the following entries
```
TM1.Server Saving...
TM1.Server The server is coming down...
TM1.Server Terminating housekeeper thread.
TM1.Server TM1ServerImpl::Destroy:
```
Pulse monitor service should detect this (especially if the shutdown has been initiated via Pulse GUI) and until the server is no longer registered with the admi host or until `Event Server shutdown` appears in the log Pulse should show the instance status as "**Shutting down**"https://support.cubewise.com/code/pulse/-/issues/3230Adding users and group remotely in Pulse for TM12022-02-10T21:52:47ZJavierAdding users and group remotely in Pulse for TM1Hello,
We would like to know if it is possible to communicate remotely with Pulse for TM1 to add or delete Users and Groups by an script or an API. We have an external application to manage the security of our applications and we wolul ...Hello,
We would like to know if it is possible to communicate remotely with Pulse for TM1 to add or delete Users and Groups by an script or an API. We have an external application to manage the security of our applications and we wolul like to add Pulse for TM1 to it.
Does Pulse for TM1 have something that we can use to do that?
Regards
Javierhttps://support.cubewise.com/code/pulse/-/issues/3158Add ability to open processes and rules in Arc2021-12-30T00:00:15ZswAdd ability to open processes and rules in Arc**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
When using the search feature it would be very useful to be able to open proceses or rules directly in Arc rather than copying the opject name then pasting this into Arc...**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
When using the search feature it would be very useful to be able to open proceses or rules directly in Arc rather than copying the opject name then pasting this into Arc.
**Describe the solution you'd like**
In the returned search list have a url link automatically created to open in Arc. Would require some sort of central setting for Arc base url.https://support.cubewise.com/code/pulse/-/issues/3104Audit Logging on Pulse Administration2021-12-01T00:53:37ZtwongAudit Logging on Pulse Administration**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
Recently been challenged by customer that changing values in Pulse administration has not been audit logged, ie. Someone has changed the admin password of the instances,...**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
Recently been challenged by customer that changing values in Pulse administration has not been audit logged, ie. Someone has changed the admin password of the instances, causing documentation failed to update for a week, and there was no log to show who has changed the admin password.
This application has a few shared privileged ID for external IT vendor to manage the TM1 system, each IT vendor has an ID on their own, now the admin password has changed by someone but no one claimed they have changed.
**Describe the solution you'd like**
Audit logging and searchable capability on all administration settings are preferred.https://support.cubewise.com/code/pulse/-/issues/2984Pulse alert severity logic customisation2021-09-30T02:26:48ZnkaushalPulse alert severity logic customisation**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
Hi team, this is on the back of a question raised on our CW forum: https://forum.cubewise.com/t/pulse-alerts-severity-numbering/4599
**Describe the solution you'd like*...**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
Hi team, this is on the back of a question raised on our CW forum: https://forum.cubewise.com/t/pulse-alerts-severity-numbering/4599
**Describe the solution you'd like**
Certain organisations have a reverse logic to severity where severity 1 is treated as MOST severe and severity 5 is treated as LEAST severe.
**Describe alternatives you've considered**
N/A
**Additional context**
I think if there is a way to customise the default logic where instead Sev 1 is treated as MOST severe and sev 5 is treated as LEAST severe would be great.
Thanks guys!
Regards,
Nimeeshhttps://support.cubewise.com/code/pulse/-/issues/2978Comma formatting for time column in Session Monitor and Active Users table2021-09-20T02:16:32ZAdamComma formatting for time column in Session Monitor and Active Users tableOn
Server Dashboard -> (Server) -> Active Users table
![2021-09-19_21-33-45](/uploads/c451ae12425709b643387730180940d8/2021-09-19_21-33-45.png)
and
Live Monitor -> (Instance) -> Session Monitor table
![2021-09-19_21-33-01](/uploads...On
Server Dashboard -> (Server) -> Active Users table
![2021-09-19_21-33-45](/uploads/c451ae12425709b643387730180940d8/2021-09-19_21-33-45.png)
and
Live Monitor -> (Instance) -> Session Monitor table
![2021-09-19_21-33-01](/uploads/71c5703af52d078764099c655dc471f7/2021-09-19_21-33-01.png)
The time column is not comma formatted, which is inconsistent with other time values across Pulse.
Can this be considered as a future enhancement?
Thank you.https://support.cubewise.com/code/pulse/-/issues/2977Live Monitor -> Session Monitor -> Default number of items per page setting2021-09-20T03:22:38ZAdamLive Monitor -> Session Monitor -> Default number of items per page settingOn the Live Monitor page, in the Session Monitor table, is it possible to set the default number of items per page?
By default, the table shows 100 items per page.
It's possible to set to a different value but if you leave the live mon...On the Live Monitor page, in the Session Monitor table, is it possible to set the default number of items per page?
By default, the table shows 100 items per page.
It's possible to set to a different value but if you leave the live monitor page (e.g. switch servers), the number of items shown is set back to 100.
It would be great if I could adjust the setting, e.g. 10 items per page by default.
Thank you!https://support.cubewise.com/code/pulse/-/issues/2947Silent/Unattended Installation2023-07-26T22:08:18ZTim LeesSilent/Unattended Installation**1. Product versions:**
- OS and Version: Windows 2016
- TM1/PA Version: N/A
- Pulse Version 6.0.3
- Browser N/A
- SQL Server Version (if applicable): N/A
**3. Describe the bug**
Installing with silent mode fails to create some ...**1. Product versions:**
- OS and Version: Windows 2016
- TM1/PA Version: N/A
- Pulse Version 6.0.3
- Browser N/A
- SQL Server Version (if applicable): N/A
**3. Describe the bug**
Installing with silent mode fails to create some of the required registry keys. Running a silent install appears to install successfully however PulseAppServer service doesn't start. With further inspection I can see the following values missing from the registry:
- HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Apache Software Foundation\Procrun 2.0\PulseAppServer\Parameters\Start\Mode
- HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Apache Software Foundation\Procrun 2.0\PulseAppServer\Parameters\Stop\Mode
- HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Apache Software Foundation\Procrun 2.0\PulseAppServer\Parameters\Java\JvmMs
- HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Apache Software Foundation\Procrun 2.0\PulseAppServer\Parameters\Java\JvmMx
- HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Apache Software Foundation\Procrun 2.0\PulseAppServer\Parameters\Java\Options (This one exists but has fewer parameters than a working installation)
Note, the PulseAppService services starts as expected after manually setting these values and restarting.
**4. To Reproduce**
Install with the following from Command Prompt or PowerShell:
".\Pulse.6.0.3.exe /S"
**7. Additional context**
In the .nsi file, InstallApplicationServerAsService function, there are 3 ExecWait commands in the finish section. Everything from the middle line is missing from the registry on my test install so my guess is the $MemoryMax variable isn’t getting a value when running in silent mode and therefore causing that line to fail. The value is currently being set on a ‘page’ and I suspect not getting a value because the page is never loaded/shown in silent mode.
Can you try setting a default value for all of the variables immediately after they get defined or in the .onInit function? I think there’s a good chance that will fix it.
Thanks,
Timhttps://support.cubewise.com/code/pulse/-/issues/2930Snooze Button on Pulse Alerts2021-08-18T10:24:06ZiboltzSnooze Button on Pulse Alerts**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
I've just spent a week on leave and was getting pinged with Pulse alerts every 30 mins telling me that a server was running low on memory.
It's obviously set up as an a...**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
I've just spent a week on leave and was getting pinged with Pulse alerts every 30 mins telling me that a server was running low on memory.
It's obviously set up as an alert which is great (and I suppose I could have logged onto Pulse through my phone somehow) to turn it off. But the sheer number of e-mails was annoying.
I'd have liked to have been able to 'snooze' an alert for an amount of time (essentially because i was aware but couldn't do anything)
**Describe the solution you'd like**
A link / button included on the e-mail to 'snooze' an alert for an amount of time / days. Essentially goes back to Pulse and turns off an alert until XX/XX/XX
**Describe alternatives you've considered**
Logging in from Phone is the obvious solution but needs a stable and quick connection. Plus the current option for an alert is binary (on or off) and I just wanted it off for a few days.
**Additional context**
Probably would have to be for all group members (and not individual) - so would be an alert level and not recipient level.
(and yes - I get the security and technical issues here, but you wouldn't want an easy feature request would you?)https://support.cubewise.com/code/pulse/-/issues/2846Display "Last Modified" Date on Objects to be Migrate2021-06-25T04:13:38ZtwongDisplay "Last Modified" Date on Objects to be Migrate**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
Pulse migration is great, however, we still get chances that we have migrated to an object that "someone else" migrated before, therefore causing version conflict.
A ty...**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
Pulse migration is great, however, we still get chances that we have migrated to an object that "someone else" migrated before, therefore causing version conflict.
A typical example is the Excel files that we need to upload to TM1, many people may be able to update the file, and doing migration via different packages.
TM1 projects are now getting bigger, even from customer site, may have over 10 people maintaining the TM1 instance, it is extremely difficult to keep track of every little change, therefore need more indicator to display to Pulse user that a conflict maybe occurred and need some attention before doing migration.
**Describe the solution you'd like**
Would be nice if can display the last modified date of the object to be migrated, and maybe even highlight to the person that someone or something might updated the object BEFORE the package created, to minimise the chance that someone may overwrite another person's work.https://support.cubewise.com/code/pulse/-/issues/2820Cube List report to include Control Objects2023-02-21T18:45:42ZgngCube List report to include Control Objects**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
Client is using Pulse 5.8.2 would like to review memory consumption of all cube in their problematic model. The Cube List Report currently does not display control objec...**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
Client is using Pulse 5.8.2 would like to review memory consumption of all cube in their problematic model. The Cube List Report currently does not display control objects which they want to include.
**Describe the solution you'd like*
Cube List report to include option to show control objects.
**Describe alternatives you've considered**
**Additional context**
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.https://support.cubewise.com/code/pulse/-/issues/2819Enhanced messaging for Unable to document system2021-06-02T00:45:55ZAdamEnhanced messaging for Unable to document system* This enhancement request is as a consequence of issue number #2814.
* We are using CP6 version 6.0.1.
* When “Update Documentation” is run by an admin, it will sometimes fail with the ambiguous “Unable to document system” error mess...* This enhancement request is as a consequence of issue number #2814.
* We are using CP6 version 6.0.1.
* When “Update Documentation” is run by an admin, it will sometimes fail with the ambiguous “Unable to document system” error message.
* The only way to discern the cause is to enable debug-level logging and investigate using the debug logs.
* The request for enhancement is to include a more detailed error message describing why the update documentation process failed, such that admin users do not need to enable and dig through debug logs.https://support.cubewise.com/code/pulse/-/issues/2818Validation Rule: Syntax validation for the Regex entered2021-06-02T00:34:43ZAdamValidation Rule: Syntax validation for the Regex entered* This enhancement request is as a consequence of issue number #2814.
* We are using CP6 version 6.0.1.
* It is presently possible for a CP6 admin to create a validation rule that includes a regular expression that is malformed.
* Th...* This enhancement request is as a consequence of issue number #2814.
* We are using CP6 version 6.0.1.
* It is presently possible for a CP6 admin to create a validation rule that includes a regular expression that is malformed.
* There is presently no validation or warning message that the REGEX entered has syntax errors.
* The only way an admin will see that there are errors with the REGEX is by enabling debug level logging upon “Update Documentation” failing with an error message “Unable to document system”.
* The request for enhancement is to include some type of syntax validation for the REGEX entered.